File: make.info, Node: Error Messages, Next: Complex Makefile, Prev: Quick Reference, Up: Top Appendix B Errors Generated by Make *********************************** Here is a list of the more common errors you might see generated by 'make', and some information about what they mean and how to fix them. Sometimes 'make' errors are not fatal, especially in the presence of a '-' prefix on a recipe line, or the '-k' command line option. Errors that are fatal are prefixed with the string '***'. Error messages are all either prefixed with the name of the program (usually 'make'), or, if the error is found in a makefile, the name of the file and line number containing the problem. In the table below, these common prefixes are left off. '[FOO] Error NN' '[FOO] SIGNAL DESCRIPTION' These errors are not really 'make' errors at all. They mean that a program that 'make' invoked as part of a recipe returned a non-0 error code ('Error NN'), which 'make' interprets as failure, or it exited in some other abnormal fashion (with a signal of some type). *Note Errors in Recipes: Errors. If no '***' is attached to the message, then the sub-process failed but the rule in the makefile was prefixed with the '-' special character, so 'make' ignored the error. 'missing separator. Stop.' 'missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop.' This means that 'make' could not understand much of anything about the makefile line it just read. GNU 'make' looks for various separators (':', '=', recipe prefix characters, etc.) to indicate what kind of line it's parsing. This message means it couldn't find a valid one. One of the most common reasons for this message is that you (or perhaps your oh-so-helpful editor, as is the case with many MS-Windows editors) have attempted to indent your recipe lines with spaces instead of a tab character. In this case, 'make' will use the second form of the error above. Remember that every line in the recipe must begin with a tab character (unless you set '.RECIPEPREFIX'; *note Special Variables::). Eight spaces do not count. *Note Rule Syntax::. 'recipe commences before first target. Stop.' 'missing rule before recipe. Stop.' This means the first thing in the makefile seems to be part of a recipe: it begins with a recipe prefix character and doesn't appear to be a legal 'make' directive (such as a variable assignment). Recipes must always be associated with a target. The second form is generated if the line has a semicolon as the first non-whitespace character; 'make' interprets this to mean you left out the "target: prerequisite" section of a rule. *Note Rule Syntax::. 'No rule to make target `XXX'.' 'No rule to make target `XXX', needed by `YYY'.' This means that 'make' decided it needed to build a target, but then couldn't find any instructions in the makefile on how to do that, either explicit or implicit (including in the default rules database). If you want that file to be built, you will need to add a rule to your makefile describing how that target can be built. Other possible sources of this problem are typos in the makefile (if that file name is wrong) or a corrupted source tree (if that file is not supposed to be built, but rather only a prerequisite). 'No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.' 'No targets. Stop.' The former means that you didn't provide any targets to be built on the command line, and 'make' couldn't find any makefiles to read in. The latter means that some makefile was found, but it didn't contain any default goal and none was given on the command line. GNU 'make' has nothing to do in these situations. *Note Arguments to Specify the Makefile: Makefile Arguments. 'Makefile `XXX' was not found.' 'Included makefile `XXX' was not found.' A makefile specified on the command line (first form) or included (second form) was not found. 'warning: overriding recipe for target `XXX'' 'warning: ignoring old recipe for target `XXX'' GNU 'make' allows only one recipe to be specified per target (except for double-colon rules). If you give a recipe for a target which already has been defined to have one, this warning is issued and the second recipe will overwrite the first. *Note Multiple Rules for One Target: Multiple Rules. 'Circular XXX <- YYY dependency dropped.' This means that 'make' detected a loop in the dependency graph: after tracing the prerequisite YYY of target XXX, and its prerequisites, etc., one of them depended on XXX again. 'Recursive variable `XXX' references itself (eventually). Stop.' This means you've defined a normal (recursive) 'make' variable XXX that, when it's expanded, will refer to itself (XXX). This is not allowed; either use simply-expanded variables (':=' or '::=') or use the append operator ('+='). *Note How to Use Variables: Using Variables. 'Unterminated variable reference. Stop.' This means you forgot to provide the proper closing parenthesis or brace in your variable or function reference. 'insufficient arguments to function `XXX'. Stop.' This means you haven't provided the requisite number of arguments for this function. See the documentation of the function for a description of its arguments. *Note Functions for Transforming Text: Functions. 'missing target pattern. Stop.' 'multiple target patterns. Stop.' 'target pattern contains no `%'. Stop.' 'mixed implicit and static pattern rules. Stop.' These errors are generated for malformed static pattern rules (*note Syntax of Static Pattern Rules: Static Usage.). The first means the target-pattern part of the rule is empty; the second means there are multiple pattern characters ('%') in the target-pattern part; the third means there are no pattern characters in the target-pattern part; and the fourth means that all three parts of the static pattern rule contain pattern characters ('%')-the first part should not contain pattern characters. If you see these errors and you aren't trying to create a static pattern rule, check the value of any variables in your target and prerequisite lists to be sure they do not contain colons. 'warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.' This warning and the next are generated if 'make' detects error conditions related to parallel processing on systems where sub-'make's can communicate (*note Communicating Options to a Sub-'make': Options/Recursion.). This warning is generated if a recursive invocation of a 'make' process is forced to have '-jN' in its argument list (where N is greater than one). This could happen, for example, if you set the 'MAKE' environment variable to 'make -j2'. In this case, the sub-'make' doesn't communicate with other 'make' processes and will simply pretend it has two jobs of its own. 'warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make rule.' In order for 'make' processes to communicate, the parent will pass information to the child. Since this could result in problems if the child process isn't actually a 'make', the parent will only do this if it thinks the child is a 'make'. The parent uses the normal algorithms to determine this (*note How the 'MAKE' Variable Works: MAKE Variable.). If the makefile is constructed such that the parent doesn't know the child is a 'make' process, then the child will receive only part of the information necessary. In this case, the child will generate this warning message and proceed with its build in a sequential manner. 'warning: ignoring prerequisites on suffix rule definition' According to POSIX, a suffix rule cannot contain prerequisites. If a rule that could be a suffix rule has prerequisites it is interpreted as a simple explicit rule, with an odd target name. This requirement is obeyed when POSIX-conforming mode is enabled (the '.POSIX' target is defined). In versions of GNU 'make' prior to 4.3, no warning was emitted and a suffix rule was created, however all prerequisites were ignored and were not part of the suffix rule. Starting with GNU 'make' 4.3 the behavior is the same, and in addition this warning is generated. In a future version the POSIX-conforming behavior will be the only behavior: no rule with a prerequisite can be suffix rule and this warning will be removed.