perlsyn(1) Perl Programmers Reference Guide perlsyn(1)
NAME
perlsyn - Perl syntax
DESCRIPTION
A Perl program consists of a sequence of declarations and statements
which run from the top to the bottom. Loops, subroutines, and other
control structures allow you to jump around within the code.
Perl is a free-form language: you can format and indent it however you
like. Whitespace serves mostly to separate tokens, unlike languages
like Python where it is an important part of the syntax, or Fortran
where it is immaterial.
Many of Perl's syntactic elements are optional. Rather than requiring
you to put parentheses around every function call and declare every
variable, you can often leave such explicit elements off and Perl will
figure out what you meant. This is known as Do What I Mean,
abbreviated DWIM. It allows programmers to be lazy and to code in a
style with which they are comfortable.
Perl borrows syntax and concepts from many languages: awk, sed, C,
Bourne Shell, Smalltalk, Lisp and even English. Other languages have
borrowed syntax from Perl, particularly its regular expression
extensions. So if you have programmed in another language you will see
familiar pieces in Perl. They often work the same, but see perltrap
for information about how they differ.
Declarations
The only things you need to declare in Perl are report formats and
subroutines (and sometimes not even subroutines). A scalar variable
holds the undefined value ("undef") until it has been assigned a
defined value, which is anything other than "undef". When used as a
number, "undef" is treated as 0; when used as a string, it is treated
as the empty string, ""; and when used as a reference that isn't being
assigned to, it is treated as an error. If you enable warnings, you'll
be notified of an uninitialized value whenever you treat "undef" as a
string or a number. Well, usually. Boolean contexts, such as:
if ($a) {}
are exempt from warnings (because they care about truth rather than
definedness). Operators such as "++", "--", "+=", "-=", and ".=", that
operate on undefined variables such as:
undef $a;
$a++;
are also always exempt from such warnings.
A declaration can be put anywhere a statement can, but has no effect on
the execution of the primary sequence of statements: declarations all
take effect at compile time. All declarations are typically put at the
beginning or the end of the script. However, if you're using
lexically-scoped private variables created with my(), state(), or
our(), you'll have to make sure your format or subroutine definition is
within the same block scope as the my if you expect to be able to
access those private variables.
Declaring a subroutine allows a subroutine name to be used as if it
were a list operator from that point forward in the program. You can
declare a subroutine without defining it by saying "sub name", thus:
sub myname;
$me = myname $0 or die "can't get myname";
A bare declaration like that declares the function to be a list
operator, not a unary operator, so you have to be careful to use
parentheses (or "or" instead of "||".) The "||" operator binds too
tightly to use after list operators; it becomes part of the last
element. You can always use parentheses around the list operators
arguments to turn the list operator back into something that behaves
more like a function call. Alternatively, you can use the prototype
"($)" to turn the subroutine into a unary operator:
sub myname ($);
$me = myname $0 || die "can't get myname";
That now parses as you'd expect, but you still ought to get in the
habit of using parentheses in that situation. For more on prototypes,
see perlsub.
Subroutines declarations can also be loaded up with the "require"
statement or both loaded and imported into your namespace with a "use"
statement. See perlmod for details on this.
A statement sequence may contain declarations of lexically-scoped
variables, but apart from declaring a variable name, the declaration
acts like an ordinary statement, and is elaborated within the sequence
of statements as if it were an ordinary statement. That means it
actually has both compile-time and run-time effects.
Comments
Text from a "#" character until the end of the line is a comment, and
is ignored. Exceptions include "#" inside a string or regular
expression.
Simple Statements
The only kind of simple statement is an expression evaluated for its
side-effects. Every simple statement must be terminated with a
semicolon, unless it is the final statement in a block, in which case
the semicolon is optional. But put the semicolon in anyway if the
block takes up more than one line, because you may eventually add
another line. Note that there are operators like "eval {}", "sub {}",
and "do {}" that look like compound statements, but aren't--they're
just TERMs in an expression--and thus need an explicit termination when
used as the last item in a statement.
Statement Modifiers
Any simple statement may optionally be followed by a SINGLE modifier,
just before the terminating semicolon (or block ending). The possible
modifiers are:
if EXPR
unless EXPR
while EXPR
until EXPR
for LIST
foreach LIST
when EXPR
The "EXPR" following the modifier is referred to as the "condition".
Its truth or falsehood determines how the modifier will behave.
"if" executes the statement once if and only if the condition is true.
"unless" is the opposite, it executes the statement unless the
condition is true (that is, if the condition is false). See "Scalar
values" in perldata for definitions of true and false.
print "Basset hounds got long ears" if length $ear >= 10;
go_outside() and play() unless $is_raining;
The for(each) modifier is an iterator: it executes the statement once
for each item in the LIST (with $_ aliased to each item in turn).
There is no syntax to specify a C-style for loop or a lexically scoped
iteration variable in this form.
print "Hello $_!\n" for qw(world Dolly nurse);
"while" repeats the statement while the condition is true. Postfix
"while" has the same magic treatment of some kinds of condition that
prefix "while" has. "until" does the opposite, it repeats the
statement until the condition is true (or while the condition is
false):
# Both of these count from 0 to 10.
print $i++ while $i <= 10;
print $j++ until $j > 10;
The "while" and "until" modifiers have the usual ""while" loop"
semantics (conditional evaluated first), except when applied to a
"do"-BLOCK (or to the Perl4 "do"-SUBROUTINE statement), in which case
the block executes once before the conditional is evaluated.
This is so that you can write loops like:
do {
$line = <STDIN>;
...
} until !defined($line) || $line eq ".\n"
See "do" in perlfunc. Note also that the loop control statements
described later will NOT work in this construct, because modifiers
don't take loop labels. Sorry. You can always put another block
inside of it (for "next"/"redo") or around it (for "last") to do that
sort of thing.
For "next" or "redo", just double the braces:
do {{
next if $x == $y;
# do something here
}} until $x++ > $z;
For "last", you have to be more elaborate and put braces around it:
{
do {
last if $x == $y**2;
# do something here
} while $x++ <= $z;
}
If you need both "next" and "last", you have to do both and also use a
loop label:
LOOP: {
do {{
next if $x == $y;
last LOOP if $x == $y**2;
# do something here
}} until $x++ > $z;
}
NOTE: The behaviour of a "my", "state", or "our" modified with a
statement modifier conditional or loop construct (for example, "my $x
if ...") is undefined. The value of the "my" variable may be "undef",
any previously assigned value, or possibly anything else. Don't rely
on it. Future versions of perl might do something different from the
version of perl you try it out on. Here be dragons.
The "when" modifier is an experimental feature that first appeared in
Perl 5.14. To use it, you should include a "use v5.14" declaration.
(Technically, it requires only the "switch" feature, but that aspect of
it was not available before 5.14.) Operative only from within a
"foreach" loop or a "given" block, it executes the statement only if
the smartmatch "$_ ~~ EXPR" is true. If the statement executes, it is
followed by a "next" from inside a "foreach" and "break" from inside a
"given".
Under the current implementation, the "foreach" loop can be anywhere
within the "when" modifier's dynamic scope, but must be within the
"given" block's lexical scope. This restriction may be relaxed in a
future release. See "Switch Statements" below.
Compound Statements
In Perl, a sequence of statements that defines a scope is called a
block. Sometimes a block is delimited by the file containing it (in
the case of a required file, or the program as a whole), and sometimes
a block is delimited by the extent of a string (in the case of an
eval).
But generally, a block is delimited by curly brackets, also known as
braces. We will call this syntactic construct a BLOCK. Because
enclosing braces are also the syntax for hash reference constructor
expressions (see perlref), you may occasionally need to disambiguate by
placing a ";" immediately after an opening brace so that Perl realises
the brace is the start of a block. You will more frequently need to
disambiguate the other way, by placing a "+" immediately before an
opening brace to force it to be interpreted as a hash reference
constructor expression. It is considered good style to use these
disambiguating mechanisms liberally, not only when Perl would otherwise
guess incorrectly.
The following compound statements may be used to control flow:
if (EXPR) BLOCK
if (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ...
if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
unless (EXPR) BLOCK
unless (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
unless (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ...
unless (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
given (EXPR) BLOCK
LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK
LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
LABEL until (EXPR) BLOCK
LABEL until (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
LABEL for (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
LABEL for VAR (LIST) BLOCK
LABEL for VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
LABEL foreach (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK
LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
LABEL BLOCK
LABEL BLOCK continue BLOCK
PHASE BLOCK
As of Perl 5.36, you can iterate over multiple values at a time by
specifying a list of lexicals within parentheses:
no warnings "experimental::for_list";
LABEL for my (VAR, VAR) (LIST) BLOCK
LABEL for my (VAR, VAR) (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
LABEL foreach my (VAR, VAR) (LIST) BLOCK
LABEL foreach my (VAR, VAR) (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
If enabled by the experimental "try" feature, the following may also be
used
try BLOCK catch (VAR) BLOCK
try BLOCK catch (VAR) BLOCK finally BLOCK
The experimental "given" statement is not automatically enabled; see
"Switch Statements" below for how to do so, and the attendant caveats.
Unlike in C and Pascal, in Perl these are all defined in terms of
BLOCKs, not statements. This means that the curly brackets are
required--no dangling statements allowed. If you want to write
conditionals without curly brackets, there are several other ways to do
it. The following all do the same thing:
if (!open(FOO)) { die "Can't open $FOO: $!" }
die "Can't open $FOO: $!" unless open(FOO);
open(FOO) || die "Can't open $FOO: $!";
open(FOO) ? () : die "Can't open $FOO: $!";
# a bit exotic, that last one
The "if" statement is straightforward. Because BLOCKs are always
bounded by curly brackets, there is never any ambiguity about which
"if" an "else" goes with. If you use "unless" in place of "if", the
sense of the test is reversed. Like "if", "unless" can be followed by
"else". "unless" can even be followed by one or more "elsif"
statements, though you may want to think twice before using that
particular language construct, as everyone reading your code will have
to think at least twice before they can understand what's going on.
The "while" statement executes the block as long as the expression is
true. The "until" statement executes the block as long as the
expression is false. The LABEL is optional, and if present, consists
of an identifier followed by a colon. The LABEL identifies the loop
for the loop control statements "next", "last", and "redo". If the
LABEL is omitted, the loop control statement refers to the innermost
enclosing loop. This may include dynamically searching through your
call-stack at run time to find the LABEL. Such desperate behavior
triggers a warning if you use the "use warnings" pragma or the -w flag.
If the condition expression of a "while" statement is based on any of a
group of iterative expression types then it gets some magic treatment.
The affected iterative expression types are "readline", the
"<FILEHANDLE>" input operator, "readdir", "glob", the "<PATTERN>"
globbing operator, and "each". If the condition expression is one of
these expression types, then the value yielded by the iterative
operator will be implicitly assigned to $_. If the condition
expression is one of these expression types or an explicit assignment
of one of them to a scalar, then the condition actually tests for
definedness of the expression's value, not for its regular truth value.
If there is a "continue" BLOCK, it is always executed just before the
conditional is about to be evaluated again. Thus it can be used to
increment a loop variable, even when the loop has been continued via
the "next" statement.
When a block is preceded by a compilation phase keyword such as
"BEGIN", "END", "INIT", "CHECK", or "UNITCHECK", then the block will
run only during the corresponding phase of execution. See perlmod for
more details.
Extension modules can also hook into the Perl parser to define new
kinds of compound statements. These are introduced by a keyword which
the extension recognizes, and the syntax following the keyword is
defined entirely by the extension. If you are an implementor, see
"PL_keyword_plugin" in perlapi for the mechanism. If you are using
such a module, see the module's documentation for details of the syntax
that it defines.
Loop Control
The "next" command starts the next iteration of the loop:
LINE: while (<STDIN>) {
next LINE if /^#/; # discard comments
...
}
The "last" command immediately exits the loop in question. The
"continue" block, if any, is not executed:
LINE: while (<STDIN>) {
last LINE if /^$/; # exit when done with header
...
}
The "redo" command restarts the loop block without evaluating the
conditional again. The "continue" block, if any, is not executed.
This command is normally used by programs that want to lie to
themselves about what was just input.
For example, when processing a file like /etc/termcap. If your input
lines might end in backslashes to indicate continuation, you want to
skip ahead and get the next record.
while (<>) {
chomp;
if (s/\\$//) {
$_ .= <>;
redo unless eof();
}
# now process $_
}
which is Perl shorthand for the more explicitly written version:
LINE: while (defined($line = <ARGV>)) {
chomp($line);
if ($line =~ s/\\$//) {
$line .= <ARGV>;
redo LINE unless eof(); # not eof(ARGV)!
}
# now process $line
}
Note that if there were a "continue" block on the above code, it would
get executed only on lines discarded by the regex (since redo skips the
continue block). A continue block is often used to reset line counters
or "m?pat?" one-time matches:
# inspired by :1,$g/fred/s//WILMA/
while (<>) {
m?(fred)? && s//WILMA $1 WILMA/;
m?(barney)? && s//BETTY $1 BETTY/;
m?(homer)? && s//MARGE $1 MARGE/;
} continue {
print "$ARGV $.: $_";
close ARGV if eof; # reset $.
reset if eof; # reset ?pat?
}
If the word "while" is replaced by the word "until", the sense of the
test is reversed, but the conditional is still tested before the first
iteration.
Loop control statements don't work in an "if" or "unless", since they
aren't loops. You can double the braces to make them such, though.
if (/pattern/) {{
last if /fred/;
next if /barney/; # same effect as "last",
# but doesn't document as well
# do something here
}}
This is caused by the fact that a block by itself acts as a loop that
executes once, see "Basic BLOCKs".
The form "while/if BLOCK BLOCK", available in Perl 4, is no longer
available. Replace any occurrence of "if BLOCK" by "if (do BLOCK)".
For Loops
Perl's C-style "for" loop works like the corresponding "while" loop;
that means that this:
for ($i = 1; $i < 10; $i++) {
...
}
is the same as this:
$i = 1;
while ($i < 10) {
...
} continue {
$i++;
}
There is one minor difference: if variables are declared with "my" in
the initialization section of the "for", the lexical scope of those
variables is exactly the "for" loop (the body of the loop and the
control sections). To illustrate:
my $i = 'samba';
for (my $i = 1; $i <= 4; $i++) {
print "$i\n";
}
print "$i\n";
when executed, gives:
1
2
3
4
samba
As a special case, if the test in the "for" loop (or the corresponding
"while" loop) is empty, it is treated as true. That is, both
for (;;) {
...
}
and
while () {
...
}
are treated as infinite loops.
Besides the normal array index looping, "for" can lend itself to many
other interesting applications. Here's one that avoids the problem you
get into if you explicitly test for end-of-file on an interactive file
descriptor causing your program to appear to hang.
$on_a_tty = -t STDIN && -t STDOUT;
sub prompt { print "yes? " if $on_a_tty }
for ( prompt(); <STDIN>; prompt() ) {
# do something
}
The condition expression of a "for" loop gets the same magic treatment
of "readline" et al that the condition expression of a "while" loop
gets.
Foreach Loops
The "foreach" loop iterates over a normal list value and sets the
scalar variable VAR to be each element of the list in turn. If the
variable is preceded with the keyword "my", then it is lexically
scoped, and is therefore visible only within the loop. Otherwise, the
variable is implicitly local to the loop and regains its former value
upon exiting the loop. If the variable was previously declared with
"my", it uses that variable instead of the global one, but it's still
localized to the loop. This implicit localization occurs only for non
C-style loops.
The "foreach" keyword is actually a synonym for the "for" keyword, so
you can use either. If VAR is omitted, $_ is set to each value.
If any element of LIST is an lvalue, you can modify it by modifying VAR
inside the loop. Conversely, if any element of LIST is NOT an lvalue,
any attempt to modify that element will fail. In other words, the
"foreach" loop index variable is an implicit alias for each item in the
list that you're looping over.
If any part of LIST is an array, "foreach" will get very confused if
you add or remove elements within the loop body, for example with
"splice". So don't do that.
"foreach" probably won't do what you expect if VAR is a tied or other
special variable. Don't do that either.
As of Perl 5.22, there is an experimental variant of this loop that
accepts a variable preceded by a backslash for VAR, in which case the
items in the LIST must be references. The backslashed variable will
become an alias to each referenced item in the LIST, which must be of
the correct type. The variable needn't be a scalar in this case, and
the backslash may be followed by "my". To use this form, you must
enable the "refaliasing" feature via "use feature". (See feature. See
also "Assigning to References" in perlref.)
As of Perl 5.36, you can iterate over multiple values at a time. You
can only iterate with lexical scalars as the iterator variables -
unlike list assignment, it's not possible to use "undef" to signify a
value that isn't wanted. This is a limitation of the current
implementation, and might be changed in the future.
If the size of the LIST is not an exact multiple of the number of
iterator variables, then on the last iteration the "excess" iterator
variables are aliases to "undef", as if the LIST had ", undef" appended
as many times as needed for its length to become an exact multiple.
This happens whether LIST is a literal LIST or an array - ie arrays are
not extended if their size is not a multiple of the iteration size,
consistent with iterating an array one-at-a-time. As these padding
elements are not lvalues, attempting to modify them will fail,
consistent with the behaviour when iterating a list with literal
"undef"s. If this is not the behaviour you desire, then before the
loop starts either explicitly extend your array to be an exact
multiple, or explicitly throw an exception.
Examples:
for (@ary) { s/foo/bar/ }
for my $elem (@elements) {
$elem *= 2;
}
for $count (reverse(1..10), "BOOM") {
print $count, "\n";
sleep(1);
}
for (1..15) { print "Merry Christmas\n"; }
foreach $item (split(/:[\\\n:]*/, $ENV{TERMCAP})) {
print "Item: $item\n";
}
use feature "refaliasing";
no warnings "experimental::refaliasing";
foreach \my %hash (@array_of_hash_references) {
# do something with each %hash
}
foreach my ($foo, $bar, $baz) (@list) {
# do something three-at-a-time
}
foreach my ($key, $value) (%hash) {
# iterate over the hash
# The hash is immediately copied to a flat list before the loop
# starts. The list contains copies of keys but aliases of values.
# This is the same behaviour as for $var (%hash) {...}
}
Here's how a C programmer might code up a particular algorithm in Perl:
for (my $i = 0; $i < @ary1; $i++) {
for (my $j = 0; $j < @ary2; $j++) {
if ($ary1[$i] > $ary2[$j]) {
last; # can't go to outer :-(
}
$ary1[$i] += $ary2[$j];
}
# this is where that last takes me
}
Whereas here's how a Perl programmer more comfortable with the idiom
might do it:
OUTER: for my $wid (@ary1) {
INNER: for my $jet (@ary2) {
next OUTER if $wid > $jet;
$wid += $jet;
}
}
See how much easier this is? It's cleaner, safer, and faster. It's
cleaner because it's less noisy. It's safer because if code gets added
between the inner and outer loops later on, the new code won't be
accidentally executed. The "next" explicitly iterates the other loop
rather than merely terminating the inner one. And it's faster because
Perl executes a "foreach" statement more rapidly than it would the
equivalent C-style "for" loop.
Perceptive Perl hackers may have noticed that a "for" loop has a return
value, and that this value can be captured by wrapping the loop in a
"do" block. The reward for this discovery is this cautionary advice:
The return value of a "for" loop is unspecified and may change without
notice. Do not rely on it.
Try Catch Exception Handling
The "try"/"catch" syntax provides control flow relating to exception
handling. The "try" keyword introduces a block which will be executed
when it is encountered, and the "catch" block provides code to handle
any exception that may be thrown by the first.
try {
my $x = call_a_function();
$x < 100 or die "Too big";
send_output($x);
}
catch ($e) {
warn "Unable to output a value; $e";
}
print "Finished\n";
Here, the body of the "catch" block (i.e. the "warn" statement) will be
executed if the initial block invokes the conditional "die", or if
either of the functions it invokes throws an uncaught exception. The
"catch" block can inspect the $e lexical variable in this case to see
what the exception was. If no exception was thrown then the "catch"
block does not happen. In either case, execution will then continue
from the following statement - in this example the "print".
The "catch" keyword must be immediately followed by a variable
declaration in parentheses, which introduces a new variable visible to
the body of the subsequent block. Inside the block this variable will
contain the exception value that was thrown by the code in the "try"
block. It is not necessary to use the "my" keyword to declare this
variable; this is implied (similar as it is for subroutine signatures).
Both the "try" and the "catch" blocks are permitted to contain control-
flow expressions, such as "return", "goto", or "next"/"last"/"redo". In
all cases they behave as expected without warnings. In particular, a
"return" expression inside the "try" block will make its entire
containing function return - this is in contrast to its behaviour
inside an "eval" block, where it would only make that block return.
Like other control-flow syntax, "try" and "catch" will yield the last
evaluated value when placed as the final statement in a function or a
"do" block. This permits the syntax to be used to create a value. In
this case remember not to use the "return" expression, or that will
cause the containing function to return.
my $value = do {
try {
get_thing(@args);
}
catch ($e) {
warn "Unable to get thing - $e";
$DEFAULT_THING;
}
};
As with other control-flow syntax, "try" blocks are not visible to
caller() (just as for example, "while" or "foreach" loops are not).
Successive levels of the "caller" result can see subroutine calls and
"eval" blocks, because those affect the way that "return" would work.
Since "try" blocks do not intercept "return", they are not of interest
to "caller".
The "try" and "catch" blocks may optionally be followed by a third
block introduced by the "finally" keyword. This third block is executed
after the rest of the construct has finished.
try {
call_a_function();
}
catch ($e) {
warn "Unable to call; $e";
}
finally {
print "Finished\n";
}
The "finally" block is equivalent to using a "defer" block and will be
invoked in the same situations; whether the "try" block completes
successfully, throws an exception, or transfers control elsewhere by
using "return", a loop control, or "goto".
Unlike the "try" and "catch" blocks, a "finally" block is not permitted
to "return", "goto" or use any loop controls. The final expression
value is ignored, and does not affect the return value of the
containing function even if it is placed last in the function.
This syntax is currently experimental and must be enabled with "use
feature 'try'". It emits a warning in the "experimental::try" category.
Basic BLOCKs
A BLOCK by itself (labeled or not) is semantically equivalent to a loop
that executes once. Thus you can use any of the loop control
statements in it to leave or restart the block. (Note that this is NOT
true in "eval{}", "sub{}", or contrary to popular belief "do{}" blocks,
which do NOT count as loops.) The "continue" block is optional.
The BLOCK construct can be used to emulate case structures.
SWITCH: {
if (/^abc/) { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; }
if (/^def/) { $def = 1; last SWITCH; }
if (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; }
$nothing = 1;
}
You'll also find that "foreach" loop used to create a topicalizer and a
switch:
SWITCH:
for ($var) {
if (/^abc/) { $abc = 1; last SWITCH; }
if (/^def/) { $def = 1; last SWITCH; }
if (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1; last SWITCH; }
$nothing = 1;
}
Such constructs are quite frequently used, both because older versions
of Perl had no official "switch" statement, and also because the new
version described immediately below remains experimental and can
sometimes be confusing.
defer blocks
A block prefixed by the "defer" modifier provides a section of code
which runs at a later time during scope exit.
A "defer" block can appear at any point where a regular block or other
statement is permitted. If the flow of execution reaches this
statement, the body of the block is stored for later, but not invoked
immediately. When the flow of control leaves the containing block for
any reason, this stored block is executed on the way past. It provides
a means of deferring execution until a later time. This acts similarly
to syntax provided by some other languages, often using keywords named
"try / finally".
This syntax is available if enabled by the "defer" named feature, and
is currently experimental. If experimental warnings are enabled it will
emit a warning when used.
use feature 'defer';
{
say "This happens first";
defer { say "This happens last"; }
say "And this happens inbetween";
}
If multiple "defer" blocks are contained in a single scope, they are
executed in LIFO order; the last one reached is the first one executed.
The code stored by the "defer" block will be invoked when control
leaves its containing block due to regular fallthrough, explicit
"return", exceptions thrown by "die" or propagated by functions called
by it, "goto", or any of the loop control statements "next", "last" or
"redo".
If the flow of control does not reach the "defer" statement itself then
its body is not stored for later execution. (This is in direct contrast
to the code provided by an "END" phaser block, which is always enqueued
by the compiler, regardless of whether execution ever reached the line
it was given on.)
use feature 'defer';
{
defer { say "This will run"; }
return;
defer { say "This will not"; }
}
Exceptions thrown by code inside a "defer" block will propagate to the
caller in the same way as any other exception thrown by normal code.
If the "defer" block is being executed due to a thrown exception and
throws another one it is not specified what happens, beyond that the
caller will definitely receive an exception.
Besides throwing an exception, a "defer" block is not permitted to
otherwise alter the control flow of its surrounding code. In
particular, it may not cause its containing function to "return", nor
may it "goto" a label, or control a containing loop using "next",
"last" or "redo". These constructions are however, permitted entirely
within the body of the "defer".
use feature 'defer';
{
defer {
foreach ( 1 .. 5 ) {
last if $_ == 3; # this is permitted
}
}
}
{
foreach ( 6 .. 10 ) {
defer {
last if $_ == 8; # this is not
}
}
}
Switch Statements
Starting from Perl 5.10.1 (well, 5.10.0, but it didn't work right), you
can say
use feature "switch";
to enable an experimental switch feature. This is loosely based on an
old version of a Raku proposal, but it no longer resembles the Raku
construct. You also get the switch feature whenever you declare that
your code prefers to run under a version of Perl between 5.10 and 5.34.
For example:
use v5.14;
Under the "switch" feature, Perl gains the experimental keywords
"given", "when", "default", "continue", and "break". Starting from
Perl 5.16, one can prefix the switch keywords with "CORE::" to access
the feature without a "use feature" statement. The keywords "given"
and "when" are analogous to "switch" and "case" in other languages --
though "continue" is not -- so the code in the previous section could
be rewritten as
use v5.10.1;
for ($var) {
when (/^abc/) { $abc = 1 }
when (/^def/) { $def = 1 }
when (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1 }
default { $nothing = 1 }
}
The "foreach" is the non-experimental way to set a topicalizer. If you
wish to use the highly experimental "given", that could be written like
this:
use v5.10.1;
given ($var) {
when (/^abc/) { $abc = 1 }
when (/^def/) { $def = 1 }
when (/^xyz/) { $xyz = 1 }
default { $nothing = 1 }
}
As of 5.14, that can also be written this way:
use v5.14;
for ($var) {
$abc = 1 when /^abc/;
$def = 1 when /^def/;
$xyz = 1 when /^xyz/;
default { $nothing = 1 }
}
Or if you don't care to play it safe, like this:
use v5.14;
given ($var) {
$abc = 1 when /^abc/;
$def = 1 when /^def/;
$xyz = 1 when /^xyz/;
default { $nothing = 1 }
}
The arguments to "given" and "when" are in scalar context, and "given"
assigns the $_ variable its topic value.
Exactly what the EXPR argument to "when" does is hard to describe
precisely, but in general, it tries to guess what you want done.
Sometimes it is interpreted as "$_ ~~ EXPR", and sometimes it is not.
It also behaves differently when lexically enclosed by a "given" block
than it does when dynamically enclosed by a "foreach" loop. The rules
are far too difficult to understand to be described here. See
"Experimental Details on given and when" later on.
Due to an unfortunate bug in how "given" was implemented between Perl
5.10 and 5.16, under those implementations the version of $_ governed
by "given" is merely a lexically scoped copy of the original, not a
dynamically scoped alias to the original, as it would be if it were a
"foreach" or under both the original and the current Raku language
specification. This bug was fixed in Perl 5.18 (and lexicalized $_
itself was removed in Perl 5.24).
If your code still needs to run on older versions, stick to "foreach"
for your topicalizer and you will be less unhappy.
Goto
Although not for the faint of heart, Perl does support a "goto"
statement. There are three forms: "goto"-LABEL, "goto"-EXPR, and
"goto"-&NAME. A loop's LABEL is not actually a valid target for a
"goto"; it's just the name of the loop.
The "goto"-LABEL form finds the statement labeled with LABEL and
resumes execution there. It may not be used to go into any construct
that requires initialization, such as a subroutine or a "foreach" loop.
It also can't be used to go into a construct that is optimized away.
It can be used to go almost anywhere else within the dynamic scope,
including out of subroutines, but it's usually better to use some other
construct such as "last" or "die". The author of Perl has never felt
the need to use this form of "goto" (in Perl, that is--C is another
matter).
The "goto"-EXPR form expects a label name, whose scope will be resolved
dynamically. This allows for computed "goto"s per FORTRAN, but isn't
necessarily recommended if you're optimizing for maintainability:
goto(("FOO", "BAR", "GLARCH")[$i]);
The "goto"-&NAME form is highly magical, and substitutes a call to the
named subroutine for the currently running subroutine. This is used by
AUTOLOAD() subroutines that wish to load another subroutine and then
pretend that the other subroutine had been called in the first place
(except that any modifications to @_ in the current subroutine are
propagated to the other subroutine.) After the "goto", not even
caller() will be able to tell that this routine was called first.
In almost all cases like this, it's usually a far, far better idea to
use the structured control flow mechanisms of "next", "last", or "redo"
instead of resorting to a "goto". For certain applications, the catch
and throw pair of "eval{}" and die() for exception processing can also
be a prudent approach.
The Ellipsis Statement
Beginning in Perl 5.12, Perl accepts an ellipsis, ""..."", as a
placeholder for code that you haven't implemented yet. When Perl 5.12
or later encounters an ellipsis statement, it parses this without
error, but if and when you should actually try to execute it, Perl
throws an exception with the text "Unimplemented":
use v5.12;
sub unimplemented { ... }
eval { unimplemented() };
if ($@ =~ /^Unimplemented at /) {
say "I found an ellipsis!";
}
You can only use the elliptical statement to stand in for a complete
statement. Syntactically, ""...;"" is a complete statement, but, as
with other kinds of semicolon-terminated statement, the semicolon may
be omitted if ""..."" appears immediately before a closing brace.
These examples show how the ellipsis works:
use v5.12;
{ ... }
sub foo { ... }
...;
eval { ... };
sub somemeth {
my $self = shift;
...;
}
$x = do {
my $n;
...;
say "Hurrah!";
$n;
};
The elliptical statement cannot stand in for an expression that is part
of a larger statement. These examples of attempts to use an ellipsis
are syntax errors:
use v5.12;
print ...;
open(my $fh, ">", "/dev/passwd") or ...;
if ($condition && ... ) { say "Howdy" };
... if $a > $b;
say "Cromulent" if ...;
$flub = 5 + ...;
There are some cases where Perl can't immediately tell the difference
between an expression and a statement. For instance, the syntax for a
block and an anonymous hash reference constructor look the same unless
there's something in the braces to give Perl a hint. The ellipsis is a
syntax error if Perl doesn't guess that the "{ ... }" is a block.
Inside your block, you can use a ";" before the ellipsis to denote that
the "{ ... }" is a block and not a hash reference constructor.
Note: Some folks colloquially refer to this bit of punctuation as a
"yada-yada" or "triple-dot", but its true name is actually an ellipsis.
PODs: Embedded Documentation
Perl has a mechanism for intermixing documentation with source code.
While it's expecting the beginning of a new statement, if the compiler
encounters a line that begins with an equal sign and a word, like this
=head1 Here There Be Pods!
Then that text and all remaining text up through and including a line
beginning with "=cut" will be ignored. The format of the intervening
text is described in perlpod.
This allows you to intermix your source code and your documentation
text freely, as in
=item snazzle($)
The snazzle() function will behave in the most spectacular
form that you can possibly imagine, not even excepting
cybernetic pyrotechnics.
=cut back to the compiler, nuff of this pod stuff!
sub snazzle($) {
my $thingie = shift;
.........
}
Note that pod translators should look at only paragraphs beginning with
a pod directive (it makes parsing easier), whereas the compiler
actually knows to look for pod escapes even in the middle of a
paragraph. This means that the following secret stuff will be ignored
by both the compiler and the translators.
$a=3;
=secret stuff
warn "Neither POD nor CODE!?"
=cut back
print "got $a\n";
You probably shouldn't rely upon the warn() being podded out forever.
Not all pod translators are well-behaved in this regard, and perhaps
the compiler will become pickier.
One may also use pod directives to quickly comment out a section of
code.
Plain Old Comments (Not!)
Perl can process line directives, much like the C preprocessor. Using
this, one can control Perl's idea of filenames and line numbers in
error or warning messages (especially for strings that are processed
with eval()). The syntax for this mechanism is almost the same as for
most C preprocessors: it matches the regular expression
# example: '# line 42 "new_filename.plx"'
/^\# \s*
line \s+ (\d+) \s*
(?:\s("?)([^"]+)\g2)? \s*
$/x
with $1 being the line number for the next line, and $3 being the
optional filename (specified with or without quotes). Note that no
whitespace may precede the "#", unlike modern C preprocessors.
There is a fairly obvious gotcha included with the line directive:
Debuggers and profilers will only show the last source line to appear
at a particular line number in a given file. Care should be taken not
to cause line number collisions in code you'd like to debug later.
Here are some examples that you should be able to type into your
command shell:
% perl
# line 200 "bzzzt"
# the '#' on the previous line must be the first char on line
die 'foo';
__END__
foo at bzzzt line 201.
% perl
# line 200 "bzzzt"
eval qq[\n#line 2001 ""\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
__END__
foo at - line 2001.
% perl
eval qq[\n#line 200 "foo bar"\ndie 'foo']; print $@;
__END__
foo at foo bar line 200.
% perl
# line 345 "goop"
eval "\n#line " . __LINE__ . ' "' . __FILE__ ."\"\ndie 'foo'";
print $@;
__END__
foo at goop line 345.
Experimental Details on given and when
As previously mentioned, the "switch" feature is considered highly
experimental (it is also scheduled to be removed in perl 5.42.0); it is
subject to change with little notice. In particular, "when" has tricky
behaviours that are expected to change to become less tricky in the
future. Do not rely upon its current (mis)implementation. Before Perl
5.18, "given" also had tricky behaviours that you should still beware
of if your code must run on older versions of Perl.
Here is a longer example of "given":
use feature ":5.10";
given ($foo) {
when (undef) {
say '$foo is undefined';
}
when ("foo") {
say '$foo is the string "foo"';
}
when ([1,3,5,7,9]) {
say '$foo is an odd digit';
continue; # Fall through
}
when ($_ < 100) {
say '$foo is numerically less than 100';
}
when (\&complicated_check) {
say 'a complicated check for $foo is true';
}
default {
die q(I don't know what to do with $foo);
}
}
Before Perl 5.18, given(EXPR) assigned the value of EXPR to merely a
lexically scoped copy (!) of $_, not a dynamically scoped alias the way
"foreach" does. That made it similar to
do { my $_ = EXPR; ... }
except that the block was automatically broken out of by a successful
"when" or an explicit "break". Because it was only a copy, and because
it was only lexically scoped, not dynamically scoped, you could not do
the things with it that you are used to in a "foreach" loop. In
particular, it did not work for arbitrary function calls if those
functions might try to access $_. Best stick to "foreach" for that.
Most of the power comes from the implicit smartmatching that can
sometimes apply. Most of the time, when(EXPR) is treated as an
implicit smartmatch of $_, that is, "$_ ~~ EXPR". (See "Smartmatch
Operator" in perlop for more information on smartmatching.) But when
EXPR is one of the 10 exceptional cases (or things like them) listed
below, it is used directly as a boolean.
1. A user-defined subroutine call or a method invocation.
2. A regular expression match in the form of "/REGEX/", "$foo =~
/REGEX/", or "$foo =~ EXPR". Also, a negated regular expression
match in the form "!/REGEX/", "$foo !~ /REGEX/", or "$foo !~ EXPR".
3. A smart match that uses an explicit "~~" operator, such as "EXPR ~~
EXPR".
NOTE: You will often have to use "$c ~~ $_" because the default
case uses "$_ ~~ $c" , which is frequently the opposite of what you
want.
4. A boolean comparison operator such as "$_ < 10" or "$x eq "abc"".
The relational operators that this applies to are the six numeric
comparisons ("<", ">", "<=", ">=", "==", and "!="), and the six
string comparisons ("lt", "gt", "le", "ge", "eq", and "ne").
5. At least the three builtin functions defined(...), exists(...), and
eof(...). We might someday add more of these later if we think of
them.
6. A negated expression, whether "!(EXPR)" or not(EXPR), or a logical
exclusive-or, "(EXPR1) xor (EXPR2)". The bitwise versions ("~" and
"^") are not included.
7. A filetest operator, with exactly 4 exceptions: "-s", "-M", "-A",
and "-C", as these return numerical values, not boolean ones. The
"-z" filetest operator is not included in the exception list.
8. The ".." and "..." flip-flop operators. Note that the "..." flip-
flop operator is completely different from the "..." elliptical
statement just described.
In those 8 cases above, the value of EXPR is used directly as a
boolean, so no smartmatching is done. You may think of "when" as a
smartsmartmatch.
Furthermore, Perl inspects the operands of logical operators to decide
whether to use smartmatching for each one by applying the above test to
the operands:
9. If EXPR is "EXPR1 && EXPR2" or "EXPR1 and EXPR2", the test is
applied recursively to both EXPR1 and EXPR2. Only if both operands
also pass the test, recursively, will the expression be treated as
boolean. Otherwise, smartmatching is used.
10. If EXPR is "EXPR1 || EXPR2", "EXPR1 // EXPR2", or "EXPR1 or EXPR2",
the test is applied recursively to EXPR1 only (which might itself
be a higher-precedence AND operator, for example, and thus subject
to the previous rule), not to EXPR2. If EXPR1 is to use
smartmatching, then EXPR2 also does so, no matter what EXPR2
contains. But if EXPR2 does not get to use smartmatching, then the
second argument will not be either. This is quite different from
the "&&" case just described, so be careful.
These rules are complicated, but the goal is for them to do what you
want (even if you don't quite understand why they are doing it). For
example:
when (/^\d+$/ && $_ < 75) { ... }
will be treated as a boolean match because the rules say both a regex
match and an explicit test on $_ will be treated as boolean.
Also:
when ([qw(foo bar)] && /baz/) { ... }
will use smartmatching because only one of the operands is a boolean:
the other uses smartmatching, and that wins.
Further:
when ([qw(foo bar)] || /^baz/) { ... }
will use smart matching (only the first operand is considered), whereas
when (/^baz/ || [qw(foo bar)]) { ... }
will test only the regex, which causes both operands to be treated as
boolean. Watch out for this one, then, because an arrayref is always a
true value, which makes it effectively redundant. Not a good idea.
Tautologous boolean operators are still going to be optimized away.
Don't be tempted to write
when ("foo" or "bar") { ... }
This will optimize down to "foo", so "bar" will never be considered
(even though the rules say to use a smartmatch on "foo"). For an
alternation like this, an array ref will work, because this will
instigate smartmatching:
when ([qw(foo bar)] { ... }
This is somewhat equivalent to the C-style switch statement's
fallthrough functionality (not to be confused with Perl's fallthrough
functionality--see below), wherein the same block is used for several
"case" statements.
Another useful shortcut is that, if you use a literal array or hash as
the argument to "given", it is turned into a reference. So given(@foo)
is the same as given(\@foo), for example.
"default" behaves exactly like "when(1 == 1)", which is to say that it
always matches.
Breaking out
You can use the "break" keyword to break out of the enclosing "given"
block. Every "when" block is implicitly ended with a "break".
Fall-through
You can use the "continue" keyword to fall through from one case to the
next immediate "when" or "default":
given($foo) {
when (/x/) { say '$foo contains an x'; continue }
when (/y/) { say '$foo contains a y' }
default { say '$foo does not contain a y' }
}
Return value
When a "given" statement is also a valid expression (for example, when
it's the last statement of a block), it evaluates to:
o An empty list as soon as an explicit "break" is encountered.
o The value of the last evaluated expression of the successful
"when"/"default" clause, if there happens to be one.
o The value of the last evaluated expression of the "given" block if
no condition is true.
In both last cases, the last expression is evaluated in the context
that was applied to the "given" block.
Note that, unlike "if" and "unless", failed "when" statements always
evaluate to an empty list.
my $price = do {
given ($item) {
when (["pear", "apple"]) { 1 }
break when "vote"; # My vote cannot be bought
1e10 when /Mona Lisa/;
"unknown";
}
};
Currently, "given" blocks can't always be used as proper expressions.
This may be addressed in a future version of Perl.
Switching in a loop
Instead of using given(), you can use a foreach() loop. For example,
here's one way to count how many times a particular string occurs in an
array:
use v5.10.1;
my $count = 0;
for (@array) {
when ("foo") { ++$count }
}
print "\@array contains $count copies of 'foo'\n";
Or in a more recent version:
use v5.14;
my $count = 0;
for (@array) {
++$count when "foo";
}
print "\@array contains $count copies of 'foo'\n";
At the end of all "when" blocks, there is an implicit "next". You can
override that with an explicit "last" if you're interested in only the
first match alone.
This doesn't work if you explicitly specify a loop variable, as in "for
$item (@array)". You have to use the default variable $_.
Differences from Raku
The Perl 5 smartmatch and "given"/"when" constructs are not compatible
with their Raku analogues. The most visible difference and least
important difference is that, in Perl 5, parentheses are required
around the argument to given() and when() (except when this last one is
used as a statement modifier). Parentheses in Raku are always optional
in a control construct such as if(), while(), or when(); they can't be
made optional in Perl 5 without a great deal of potential confusion,
because Perl 5 would parse the expression
given $foo {
...
}
as though the argument to "given" were an element of the hash %foo,
interpreting the braces as hash-element syntax.
However, their are many, many other differences. For example, this
works in Perl 5:
use v5.12;
my @primary = ("red", "blue", "green");
if (@primary ~~ "red") {
say "primary smartmatches red";
}
if ("red" ~~ @primary) {
say "red smartmatches primary";
}
say "that's all, folks!";
But it doesn't work at all in Raku. Instead, you should use the
(parallelizable) "any" operator:
if any(@primary) eq "red" {
say "primary smartmatches red";
}
if "red" eq any(@primary) {
say "red smartmatches primary";
}
The table of smartmatches in "Smartmatch Operator" in perlop is not
identical to that proposed by the Raku specification, mainly due to
differences between Raku's and Perl 5's data models, but also because
the Raku spec has changed since Perl 5 rushed into early adoption.
In Raku, when() will always do an implicit smartmatch with its
argument, while in Perl 5 it is convenient (albeit potentially
confusing) to suppress this implicit smartmatch in various rather
loosely-defined situations, as roughly outlined above. (The difference
is largely because Perl 5 does not have, even internally, a boolean
type.)
perl v5.38.2 2023-11-28 perlsyn(1)
perl 5.38.2 - Generated Sun Dec 1 12:48:50 CST 2024