polkit-auth(1) polkit-auth polkit-auth(1)
NAME
polkit-auth - Manage authorizations
SYNOPSIS
polkit-auth [--obtain action] [--show-obtainable]
[[--user user] --explicit]
[[--user user] --explicit-detail]
[[--user user] --grant action [--constraint constraint]*]
[[--user user] --block action [--constraint constraint]*]
[[--user user] --revoke action] [--version] [--help]
DESCRIPTION
polkit-auth is used to inspect, obtain, grant and revoke PolicyKit
authorizations. If invoked without any options, the authorizations of
the calling process will be printed.
OPTIONS
--obtain action
Attempt to obtain an authorization through authentication for the
given action. This is only useful for implicit authorizations
requiring authentication; e.g. when an appropriate stanza in the
defaults section of the .policy file for the action specifies
auth_*.
The gained authorization will be constrained as much as possible
using the constraints specified in the section called
"CONSTRAINTS". For example, on a system running SELinux, if the
caller runs uses this tool to obtain an authorization from a shell
in a desktop in an active session, then constraints for local,
active, exe and selinux_context will all be added.
If an Authentication Agent (such as the one from PolicyKit-gnome)
is available in the session, it will used for authentication unless
the environment variable POLKIT_AUTH_FORCE_TEXT is set. If the
environment variable POLKIT_AUTH_GRANT_TO_PID is set, the
authorization will be granted to that process id instead of the
invoking process (e.g. the shell from which polkit-auth is
launched).
--show-obtainable
Prints all actions that can be obtained via authentication and for
which an authorization does not exist.
[--user user] --explicit
Show explicit authorizations. Duplicates are not printed. If used
with the --user option, the authorization
org.freedesktop.policykit.read is required.
[--user user] --explicit-detail
Show detailed information about explicit authorizations. In
contrast to the --explicit, duplicates are printed as several
authorizations with different scope and constraints may exist.
[--user user] --grant action [--constraint constraint]*
Grant an authorization for an action. This is different than
--obtain insofar that the defaults stanza of the .policy file is
not consulted. Optionally, one or more constraints on the granted
authorization can be specified, see the section called
"CONSTRAINTS" for details. The authorization needed to grant
authorizations is org.freedesktop.policykit.grant.
[--user user] --block action [--constraint constraint]*
Grant an negative authorization for an action. Negative
authorizations are normally used to block users that would normally
be authorized due to implicit authorizations. Optionally, one or
more constraints on the granted authorization can be specified, see
the section called "CONSTRAINTS" for details. The authorization
needed to grant negative authorizations is
org.freedesktop.policykit.grant if the "beneficiary" is another
user.
[--user user] --revoke action
Revoke all authorizations for an action. If the user is not
specified the calling user is used. The authorization
org.freedesktop.policykit.revoke is needed to revoke authorizations
from other users.
--version
Show version and exit.
--help
Show this information.
CONSTRAINTS
One can put one or more constraints on an authorization. They are used
to limit where the authrorization applies. Presently the following
constraints are supported
--constraint local
The caller must be in a session on a local console attached to the
system. For example processes that belong to remote XDMCP or ssh
connections will fail to meet this constraint and as such the
authorization with such a constraint won't apply.
--constraint active
The caller must be in an active session. This is typically used
with a local constraint to ensure that the caller is only
authorized if his session is in the foreground. This is typically
used for fast user switching (multiple sessions on the same
console) to prevent inactive sessions from doing privileged
operations like spying (using a webcam or a sound card) on the
current active session.
--constraint exe:/path/to/program
The authorization is constrained to processes for where executable
path (/proc/pid/exe on Linux) matches the given path. See the
section called "NOTES" for limitations on why this may not be
secure.
--constraint selinux_context:system_u:object_r:some_context_t
The authorization is constrained to processes for where their
SELinux security context matches the given context.
NOTES
Note that the executable path for a process is not necessary reliable
information and as such shouldn't be relied on 100% to make a security
decision. In fact, this information is only trustworthy in situations
where the given binary is securely locked down meaning that 1) it can't
be ptrace(2)'d; 2) libc secure mode kicks in (e.g LD_PRELOAD won't
work); 3) there are no other attack vectors (e.g. GTK_MODULES, X11,
CORBA, D-Bus) to patch running code into the process.
In other words: the risk of relying on constraining an authorization to
a path of an executable is high. Suppose that the program
/usr/bin/gullible obtains an authorization via authentication for the
action org.example.foo. We add a constraint to say that the gained
authorization only applies to processes for whom /proc/pid/exe points
to /usr/bin/gullible.
Now enter /usr/bin/evil. It knows that the program /usr/bin/gullible is
not "securely locked down" (per the definition in the above paragraph).
So /usr/bin/evil simply sets LD_PRELOAD and execs /usr/bin/gullible and
it can now run code in a process where /proc/pid/exe points to
/usr/bin/gullible. Thus, the recently gained authorization for
org.example.foo applies. Also, /usr/bin/evil could use a host of other
attack vectors to run it's own code under the disguise of pretending to
be /usr/bin/gullible.
Specifically for interpreted languages like Python and Mono it is the
case that /proc/pid/exe always points to /usr/bin/python resp.
/usr/bin/mono. Thus, it's not very useful to rely on that the result
for this function if you want to constrain an authorization to e.g.
/usr/bin/tomboy or /usr/bin/banshee.
It is however possible to write programs that are "securely locked
down" (per the definition in the above paragraph); for example all
properly written setuid and setgid programs are written in this way.
COMPLETION
PolicyKit ships with a collection of shell functions such that
completion on users, actions and constraints work when using the
bash(1) shell. For completion to properly work for polkit-auth,
arguments should be entered in the order specified in this manual page;
for example. --user should be specified before --revoke to complete
only on the authorizations the given user has. Note that if the calling
user lacks the org.freedesktop.policykit.read authorization, the
completion function will fall back to completing on all registered
actions.
BUGS
Please send bug reports to either the distribution or the hal mailing
list, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/hal. to
subscribe.
SEE ALSO
PolicyKit(8), PolicyKit.conf(5), polkit-action(1)
PolicyKit August 2007 polkit-auth(1)
PolicyKit 0.9 - Generated Fri May 8 12:37:51 CDT 2009