manpagez: man pages & more
man EXPLAIN(7)
Home | html | info | man
EXPLAIN(7)               PostgreSQL 17.4 Documentation              EXPLAIN(7)


NAME

       EXPLAIN - show the execution plan of a statement


SYNOPSIS

       EXPLAIN [ ( option [, ...] ) ] statement

       where option can be one of:

           ANALYZE [ boolean ]
           VERBOSE [ boolean ]
           COSTS [ boolean ]
           SETTINGS [ boolean ]
           GENERIC_PLAN [ boolean ]
           BUFFERS [ boolean ]
           SERIALIZE [ { NONE | TEXT | BINARY } ]
           WAL [ boolean ]
           TIMING [ boolean ]
           SUMMARY [ boolean ]
           MEMORY [ boolean ]
           FORMAT { TEXT | XML | JSON | YAML }


DESCRIPTION

       This command displays the execution plan that the PostgreSQL planner
       generates for the supplied statement. The execution plan shows how the
       table(s) referenced by the statement will be scanned -- by plain
       sequential scan, index scan, etc. -- and if multiple tables are
       referenced, what join algorithms will be used to bring together the
       required rows from each input table.

       The most critical part of the display is the estimated statement
       execution cost, which is the planner's guess at how long it will take
       to run the statement (measured in cost units that are arbitrary, but
       conventionally mean disk page fetches). Actually two numbers are shown:
       the start-up cost before the first row can be returned, and the total
       cost to return all the rows. For most queries the total cost is what
       matters, but in contexts such as a subquery in EXISTS, the planner will
       choose the smallest start-up cost instead of the smallest total cost
       (since the executor will stop after getting one row, anyway). Also, if
       you limit the number of rows to return with a LIMIT clause, the planner
       makes an appropriate interpolation between the endpoint costs to
       estimate which plan is really the cheapest.

       The ANALYZE option causes the statement to be actually executed, not
       only planned. Then actual run time statistics are added to the display,
       including the total elapsed time expended within each plan node (in
       milliseconds) and the total number of rows it actually returned. This
       is useful for seeing whether the planner's estimates are close to
       reality.

           Important

           Keep in mind that the statement is actually executed when the
           ANALYZE option is used. Although EXPLAIN will discard any output
           that a SELECT would return, other side effects of the statement
           will happen as usual. If you wish to use EXPLAIN ANALYZE on an
           INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, MERGE, CREATE TABLE AS, or EXECUTE
           statement without letting the command affect your data, use this
           approach:

               BEGIN;
               EXPLAIN ANALYZE ...;
               ROLLBACK;


PARAMETERS

       ANALYZE
           Carry out the command and show actual run times and other
           statistics. This parameter defaults to FALSE.

       VERBOSE
           Display additional information regarding the plan. Specifically,
           include the output column list for each node in the plan tree,
           schema-qualify table and function names, always label variables in
           expressions with their range table alias, and always print the name
           of each trigger for which statistics are displayed. The query
           identifier will also be displayed if one has been computed, see
           compute_query_id for more details. This parameter defaults to
           FALSE.

       COSTS
           Include information on the estimated startup and total cost of each
           plan node, as well as the estimated number of rows and the
           estimated width of each row. This parameter defaults to TRUE.

       SETTINGS
           Include information on configuration parameters. Specifically,
           include options affecting query planning with value different from
           the built-in default value. This parameter defaults to FALSE.

       GENERIC_PLAN
           Allow the statement to contain parameter placeholders like $1, and
           generate a generic plan that does not depend on the values of those
           parameters. See PREPARE for details about generic plans and the
           types of statement that support parameters. This parameter cannot
           be used together with ANALYZE. It defaults to FALSE.

       BUFFERS
           Include information on buffer usage. Specifically, include the
           number of shared blocks hit, read, dirtied, and written, the number
           of local blocks hit, read, dirtied, and written, the number of temp
           blocks read and written, and the time spent reading and writing
           data file blocks, local blocks and temporary file blocks (in
           milliseconds) if track_io_timing is enabled. A hit means that a
           read was avoided because the block was found already in cache when
           needed. Shared blocks contain data from regular tables and indexes;
           local blocks contain data from temporary tables and indexes; while
           temporary blocks contain short-term working data used in sorts,
           hashes, Materialize plan nodes, and similar cases. The number of
           blocks dirtied indicates the number of previously unmodified blocks
           that were changed by this query; while the number of blocks written
           indicates the number of previously-dirtied blocks evicted from
           cache by this backend during query processing. The number of blocks
           shown for an upper-level node includes those used by all its child
           nodes. In text format, only non-zero values are printed. This
           parameter defaults to FALSE.

       SERIALIZE
           Include information on the cost of serializing the query's output
           data, that is converting it to text or binary format to send to the
           client. This can be a significant part of the time required for
           regular execution of the query, if the datatype output functions
           are expensive or if TOASTed values must be fetched from out-of-line
           storage.  EXPLAIN's default behavior, SERIALIZE NONE, does not
           perform these conversions. If SERIALIZE TEXT or SERIALIZE BINARY is
           specified, the appropriate conversions are performed, and the time
           spent doing so is measured (unless TIMING OFF is specified). If the
           BUFFERS option is also specified, then any buffer accesses involved
           in the conversions are counted too. In no case, however, will
           EXPLAIN actually send the resulting data to the client; hence
           network transmission costs cannot be investigated this way.
           Serialization may only be enabled when ANALYZE is also enabled. If
           SERIALIZE is written without an argument, TEXT is assumed.

       WAL
           Include information on WAL record generation. Specifically, include
           the number of records, number of full page images (fpi) and the
           amount of WAL generated in bytes. In text format, only non-zero
           values are printed. This parameter may only be used when ANALYZE is
           also enabled. It defaults to FALSE.

       TIMING
           Include actual startup time and time spent in each node in the
           output. The overhead of repeatedly reading the system clock can
           slow down the query significantly on some systems, so it may be
           useful to set this parameter to FALSE when only actual row counts,
           and not exact times, are needed. Run time of the entire statement
           is always measured, even when node-level timing is turned off with
           this option. This parameter may only be used when ANALYZE is also
           enabled. It defaults to TRUE.

       SUMMARY
           Include summary information (e.g., totaled timing information)
           after the query plan. Summary information is included by default
           when ANALYZE is used but otherwise is not included by default, but
           can be enabled using this option. Planning time in EXPLAIN EXECUTE
           includes the time required to fetch the plan from the cache and the
           time required for re-planning, if necessary.

       MEMORY
           Include information on memory consumption by the query planning
           phase. Specifically, include the precise amount of storage used by
           planner in-memory structures, as well as total memory considering
           allocation overhead. This parameter defaults to FALSE.

       FORMAT
           Specify the output format, which can be TEXT, XML, JSON, or YAML.
           Non-text output contains the same information as the text output
           format, but is easier for programs to parse. This parameter
           defaults to TEXT.

       boolean
           Specifies whether the selected option should be turned on or off.
           You can write TRUE, ON, or 1 to enable the option, and FALSE, OFF,
           or 0 to disable it. The boolean value can also be omitted, in which
           case TRUE is assumed.

       statement
           Any SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, MERGE, VALUES, EXECUTE,
           DECLARE, CREATE TABLE AS, or CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW AS statement,
           whose execution plan you wish to see.


OUTPUTS

       The command's result is a textual description of the plan selected for
       the statement, optionally annotated with execution statistics.
       Section 14.1 describes the information provided.


NOTES

       In order to allow the PostgreSQL query planner to make reasonably
       informed decisions when optimizing queries, the pg_statistic data
       should be up-to-date for all tables used in the query. Normally the
       autovacuum daemon will take care of that automatically. But if a table
       has recently had substantial changes in its contents, you might need to
       do a manual ANALYZE rather than wait for autovacuum to catch up with
       the changes.

       In order to measure the run-time cost of each node in the execution
       plan, the current implementation of EXPLAIN ANALYZE adds profiling
       overhead to query execution. As a result, running EXPLAIN ANALYZE on a
       query can sometimes take significantly longer than executing the query
       normally. The amount of overhead depends on the nature of the query, as
       well as the platform being used. The worst case occurs for plan nodes
       that in themselves require very little time per execution, and on
       machines that have relatively slow operating system calls for obtaining
       the time of day.


EXAMPLES

       To show the plan for a simple query on a table with a single integer
       column and 10000 rows:

           EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM foo;

                                  QUERY PLAN
           ---------------------------------------------------------
            Seq Scan on foo  (cost=0.00..155.00 rows=10000 width=4)
           (1 row)

       Here is the same query, with JSON output formatting:

           EXPLAIN (FORMAT JSON) SELECT * FROM foo;
                      QUERY PLAN
           --------------------------------
            [                             +
              {                           +
                "Plan": {                 +
                  "Node Type": "Seq Scan",+
                  "Relation Name": "foo", +
                  "Alias": "foo",         +
                  "Startup Cost": 0.00,   +
                  "Total Cost": 155.00,   +
                  "Plan Rows": 10000,     +
                  "Plan Width": 4         +
                }                         +
              }                           +
            ]
           (1 row)

       If there is an index and we use a query with an indexable WHERE
       condition, EXPLAIN might show a different plan:

           EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM foo WHERE i = 4;

                                    QUERY PLAN
           --------------------------------------------------------------
            Index Scan using fi on foo  (cost=0.00..5.98 rows=1 width=4)
              Index Cond: (i = 4)
           (2 rows)

       Here is the same query, but in YAML format:

           EXPLAIN (FORMAT YAML) SELECT * FROM foo WHERE i='4';
                     QUERY PLAN
           -------------------------------
            - Plan:                      +
                Node Type: "Index Scan"  +
                Scan Direction: "Forward"+
                Index Name: "fi"         +
                Relation Name: "foo"     +
                Alias: "foo"             +
                Startup Cost: 0.00       +
                Total Cost: 5.98         +
                Plan Rows: 1             +
                Plan Width: 4            +
                Index Cond: "(i = 4)"
           (1 row)

       XML format is left as an exercise for the reader.

       Here is the same plan with cost estimates suppressed:

           EXPLAIN (COSTS FALSE) SELECT * FROM foo WHERE i = 4;

                   QUERY PLAN
           ----------------------------
            Index Scan using fi on foo
              Index Cond: (i = 4)
           (2 rows)

       Here is an example of a query plan for a query using an aggregate
       function:

           EXPLAIN SELECT sum(i) FROM foo WHERE i < 10;

                                        QUERY PLAN
           ---------------------------------------------------------------------
            Aggregate  (cost=23.93..23.93 rows=1 width=4)
              ->  Index Scan using fi on foo  (cost=0.00..23.92 rows=6 width=4)
                    Index Cond: (i < 10)
           (3 rows)

       Here is an example of using EXPLAIN EXECUTE to display the execution
       plan for a prepared query:

           PREPARE query(int, int) AS SELECT sum(bar) FROM test
               WHERE id > $1 AND id < $2
               GROUP BY foo;

           EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE query(100, 200);

                                                                  QUERY PLAN
           -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            HashAggregate  (cost=10.77..10.87 rows=10 width=12) (actual time=0.043..0.044 rows=10 loops=1)
              Group Key: foo
              Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 24kB
              ->  Index Scan using test_pkey on test  (cost=0.29..10.27 rows=99 width=8) (actual time=0.009..0.025 rows=99 loops=1)
                    Index Cond: ((id > 100) AND (id < 200))
            Planning Time: 0.244 ms
            Execution Time: 0.073 ms
           (7 rows)

       Of course, the specific numbers shown here depend on the actual
       contents of the tables involved. Also note that the numbers, and even
       the selected query strategy, might vary between PostgreSQL releases due
       to planner improvements. In addition, the ANALYZE command uses random
       sampling to estimate data statistics; therefore, it is possible for
       cost estimates to change after a fresh run of ANALYZE, even if the
       actual distribution of data in the table has not changed.

       Notice that the previous example showed a "custom" plan for the
       specific parameter values given in EXECUTE. We might also wish to see
       the generic plan for a parameterized query, which can be done with
       GENERIC_PLAN:

           EXPLAIN (GENERIC_PLAN)
             SELECT sum(bar) FROM test
               WHERE id > $1 AND id < $2
               GROUP BY foo;

                                             QUERY PLAN
           -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            HashAggregate  (cost=26.79..26.89 rows=10 width=12)
              Group Key: foo
              ->  Index Scan using test_pkey on test  (cost=0.29..24.29 rows=500 width=8)
                    Index Cond: ((id > $1) AND (id < $2))
           (4 rows)

       In this case the parser correctly inferred that $1 and $2 should have
       the same data type as id, so the lack of parameter type information
       from PREPARE was not a problem. In other cases it might be necessary to
       explicitly specify types for the parameter symbols, which can be done
       by casting them, for example:

           EXPLAIN (GENERIC_PLAN)
             SELECT sum(bar) FROM test
               WHERE id > $1::integer AND id < $2::integer
               GROUP BY foo;



COMPATIBILITY

       There is no EXPLAIN statement defined in the SQL standard.

       The following syntax was used before PostgreSQL version 9.0 and is
       still supported:

           EXPLAIN [ ANALYZE ] [ VERBOSE ] statement

       Note that in this syntax, the options must be specified in exactly the
       order shown.


SEE ALSO

       ANALYZE(7)

PostgreSQL 17.4                      2025                           EXPLAIN(7)

postgresql 17.4 - Generated Sat Mar 22 16:46:19 CDT 2025
© manpagez.com 2000-2025
Individual documents may contain additional copyright information.