lft(8) BSD System Manager's Manual lft(8)
NAME
lft -- display the route packets take to a network host/socket using one
of several layer-4 protocols and methods; optionally show heuristic net-
work information in transitu
SYNOPSIS
lft [-d dport] [-s sport] [-m retry min] [-M retry max] [-a ahead]
[-c scatter ms] [-t timeout ms] [-l min ttl] [-H max ttl] [-L length]
[-q ISN] [-D device] [-f device] [-G icons path]
[-ACEINPRSTUVbeghinpruvxyz] [<gateway> <...>] target:dport
DESCRIPTION
The Internet is a large and complex aggregation of network hardware, con-
nected together by gateways. Tracking the route one's packets follow (or
finding the miscreant gateway that's discarding your packets) can be dif-
ficult. (from traceroute(8))
lft was developed to automate a solution to the above, taking into
account that modern networks contain many configurations of load bal-
ancers, proxies, and stateful firewalls.
lft implements numerous network tracing methods and strategies. Gener-
ally, lft sends various types of layer-4 probes utilizing the IP protocol
`time to live' field and attempts to elicit an ICMP `time exceeded in
transit' response from each gateway along the path to some host. RFC
1393 Traceroute Using an IP Option is also available as one of several
tracing methods.
lft additionally listens for various messages along the way to assist
network managers in ascertaining per-protocol heuristic routing informa-
tion. lft can optionally retrieve various information about the networks
it traverses using a variety of sources such as registries, routing
arbiters, etc.
The only mandatory parameter is the target host name or IP number.
Options toggle the display of more interesting data or change the vari-
ables of the trace itself. The (-E/-e) adaptive option tries several
combinations of TCP states (changing flags inside the probes it sends) in
order to improve the chances of a successful trace and expose stateful
packet filters.
Other options are:
-d dport
Set dport as the destination TCP port of the probes LFT gener-
ates. Default is 80. This option is useful to see if packets
follow a different route based on protocol destination, a likely
scenario when load balancers or proxies are involved. This
option may also bypass less sophisticated packet filter configu-
rations.
-s sport
Set sport as the origin TCP port of the probes LFT generates.
Default is 53. This option is useful to see if packets follow a
different route based on protocol source. This option may also
bypass less sophisticated packet filter configurations.
-z Automatically select a pseudo-random source port. This option
may be useful if your local packet filter or proxy doesn't allow
you to use source ports outside of the dymanic range allocation.
-m min Set min as the minimum number of re-attempts to send per host.
Default is 1 unless adaptive (-E) mode is used.
-M max Set max as the maximum number of re-attempts to send per host.
Default is 3.
-a ahead
Set ahead as the number of hops forward to query before waiting
for a response. Default is 5.
-c scatter ms
Set scatter ms as the minimum number of milliseconds to wait
between sending probes. Default is 20.
-t timeout ms
Set timeout ms as the maximum number of milliseconds to wait
before assuming a probe was lost/discarded. Default is 1000.
-l min ttl
Set min tll as the minimum TTL (time-to-live) on outgoing probes
(essentially, the first hop in the line that you want to dis-
play). Default is 1.
-q ISN Set ISN as the ISN (initial sequence number) of the first probe.
If unset, one will be automatically generated using a pseudo-ran-
dom, time-seeded algorithm.
-L length
Set length as the size of probe packets in bytes. This includes
layer-3 and layer-4 headers, but does not include layer-2 head-
ers. For example, setting the length to 1500 would create a
1500-byte probe packet which would result in a 1514-byte frame on
an Ethernet network.
-D device
Set device as the network device or address to receive traffic.
(e.g., "en1" or "1.2.3.4") If unset, lft will attempt to deter-
mine and acquire the appropriate interface based on routing.
-f device
Set device as the network device or address to transmit traffic.
(e.g., "en1" or "1.2.3.4") If unset, lft will attempt to deter-
mine and acquire the appropriate interface based on routing.
This serves to operate lft in a passive mode where you may trans-
mit from a (potentially) spoofed IP address on one interface, yet
receive on another. This allows you to trace from a different IP
address whose traffic you can see in order to intercept replies.
-H ttl Set ttl as the maximum TTL, essentially the maximum route traver-
sal distance in hops. Default is 30.
-G icons path
Set icons path as the path to GraphViz icons in connection with
GraphViz output.
-I Set the ToS (Type of Serice) bit on outgoing IP datagrams. The
ToS will be set to the differentiated services request minimize-
delay.
-i Disable "stop" on ICMP other than TTL expired.
-n Print addresses numerically rather than symbolically and numeri-
cally. Disables use of the DNS resolver completely.
-h Print addresses symbolically rather than symbolically and numeri-
cally. If the DNS resolver fails to resolve an address, the
address is printed numerically.
-E/e Enable use of the adaptive engine which tries several combina-
tions of TCP states (changing flags inside the probes it sends)
in order to improve the chances of a successful trace. The
engine also displays other useful information such as stateful
inspection firewalls or broken IP stacks encountered along the
way.
-F Enable use of TCP packets with the FIN flag set. This strategy
fools unsophisticated packet filters that don't maintain a proper
state table. Such devices will forward the packet to its desti-
nation rather than filter it, assuming a handshake has already
taken place and the probes are part of an existing and valid TCP
stream.
-u Enable use of UDP-based probes instead of TCP-based probes. This
strategy is similar to the traditional traceroute method, but
many of LFT's other options (such as source and destination port
selection) are still available. By default, LFT's UDP probes
have a small payload (unlike LFT's TCP probes that carry no pay-
load).
-N Enable lookup and display of network or AS names (e.g., [GNTY-
NETBLK-4]). This option queries Prefix WhoIs, RIPE NCC, or the
RADB (as requested). In the case of Prefix WhoIs or RADB, the
network name is displayed. In the case of RIPE NCC, the AS name
is displayed.
-P Enable RFC 1393 tracing method using ICMP and an IP option.
While this strategy has been formalized in an RFC, few network
equipment vendors support it.
-p Enable use of ICMP-based probes instead of TCP-based probes.
This strategy is sometimes the fastest, however firewalls com-
monly filter ICMP at network borders. ICMP probes are echo
request (ping) packets.
-b Enable TCP basic tracing method. Unlike the default method, the
basic method generates TCP probes without relying upon sequence
numbers being conveyed correctly. This makes LFT more comptabile
with networks employing NAT, but is slower than the default
method. TCP basic may also be used with adaptive mode (-E).
-A Enable lookup and display of of AS (autonomous system) numbers
(e.g., [1]). This option queries one of several whois servers
(see options 'C' and 'r') in order to ascertain the origin ASN of
the IP address in question. By default, LFT uses the pWhoIs ser-
vice whose ASN data tends to be more accurate and more timely
than using the RADB as it is derived from the Internet's global
routing table. See www.pwhois.org
-r Force use of the RIPE NCC RIS whois service to lookup ASNs. This
is an alternative source of timely ASN-related information built
using the Internet's global routing table. See
www.ripe.net/projects/ris
-C Force use of the Cymru whois service to lookup ASNs. This is an
alternative source of timely ASN-related information built using
the Internet's global routing table. See www.cymru.com
-R Force use of the RADB whois service to lookup ASNs. This tends
to be quick, but incomplete and usually inaccurate with regard to
the 'actual' Internet routing table. See www.radb.net
-T Enable display of LFT's execution timer. This option places
timers on the trace itself and on lookups and name resolution to
show where LFT is spending its time, waiting on resolvers, or
processing trace packets. Use with -V (verbose) to display addi-
tional detail.
-U Display all times in UTC/GMT0. This option also enables the -T
option automatically.
-S Suppress display of the real-time status bar. This option makes
LFT show its completed trace output only, no-frills.
-x Enable XML output and suppress all other output to stdout.
-g Enable GraphViz output and suppress all other output to stdout.
-y Enable network seam testing in connection with GraphViz output.
-V Display verbose output. Use more V's for more info.
-v Display version information, then exit(1).
Any hosts listed after these options and before the final host/target
will comprise the loose source route. Since network operators have secu-
rity concerns regarding the use of source routing, don't expect the LSRR
options to do anything for you in most public networks.
EXAMPLES
A sample use and output might be:
[edge.lax]$ lft -S 4.2.2.2
Hop LFT trace to vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net (4.2.2.2):80/tcp
1 ln-gateway.centergate.com (206.117.161.1) 0.5ms
2 isi-acg.ln.net (130.152.136.1) 2.3ms
3 isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net (130.152.180.21) 2.5ms
4 gigabitethernet5-0.lsanca1-cr3.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.249) 3.0ms
5 p6-0.lsanca1-cr6.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.2) 3.4ms
6 p6-0.lsanca2-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.5.49) 3.3ms
7 p15-0.snjpca1-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.5.58) 10.9ms
8 so-3-0-0.mtvwca1-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.7.33) 11.1ms
9 p7-0.mtvwca1-dc-dbe1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.9.166) 11.0ms
10 vlan40.mtvwca1-dc1-dfa1-rc1.bbnplanet.net (128.11.193.67) 11.1ms
** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTLs 11 through 20
** [4.2-3 BSD bug] the next gateway may errantly reply with reused TTLs
21 [target] vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net (4.2.2.2) 11.2ms
The (-S) option was used to suppress the real-time status bar for clean
output. LFT's "**" notifiers in between hops 10 and 21 represent addi-
tional useful information: the first is a "[neglected]" indicator that
lets us know that none of the probes sent with the TTLs indicated
elicited responses. This could be for a variety of reasons, but the
cause of this specific occurrence is described in the next informative
message which indicates that this is likely the result of a bug in the
4.[23] BSD network code (and its derivatives): BSD 4.x (x < 3) sends an
unreachable message using whatever TTL remains in the original datagram.
Since, for gateways, the remaining TTL is zero, the ICMP "time exceeded"
is guaranteed to not make it back to us. LFT does its best to identify
this condition rather than print lots and lots of hops that don't exist
(trying to reach a high enough TTL).
Now, using the adaptive engine option:
[edge.lax]$ lft -E -S 4.2.2.1
Hop LFT trace to vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net (4.2.2.1):80/tcp
1 ln-gateway.centergate.com (206.117.161.1) 0.5/0.5ms
2 isi-acg.ln.net (130.152.136.1) 2.1/2.3ms
3 isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net (130.152.180.21) 2.6/7.1ms
4 gigabitethernet5-0.lsanca1-cr3.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.249) 6.1/3.9ms
** [firewall] the next gateway may statefully inspect packets
5 p0-0-0.lsanca1-csr1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.10) 155.4/3.7ms
6 [target] vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net (4.2.2.1) 22.6/3.7/*/*/*/*/*ms
In the scenario above, the adaptive engine was able to identify a state-
ful, packet-inspecting firewall in the path. Another example with more
options:
[edge.lax]$ lft -S -A -T -m 2 -d 80 -s 53 www.yahoo.com
Hop LFT trace to w9.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.71.88):80/tcp
1 [226] ln-gateway.centergate.com (206.117.161.1) 1 ms
2 [226] isi-acg.ln.net (130.152.136.1) 2 ms
3 [226] isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net (130.152.180.21) 3 ms
4 [1] gigether5-0.lsanca1-cr3.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.249) 3 ms
5 [1] p6-0.lsanca1-cr6.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.2) 5 ms
6 [1] p6-0.lsanca2-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.5.49) 3 ms
7 [1] p1-0.lsanca2-cr2.bbnplanet.net (4.25.112.1) 3 ms
8 [16852] pos4-0.core1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (209.0.227.57) 3 ms
9 [3356] so-4-0-0.mp1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (209.247.10.193) 3 ms
10 [3356] so-3-0-0.mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net (64.159.1.130) 11 ms
11 [3356] gige10-0.ipcolo4.SanJose1.Level3.net (64.159.2.42) 11 ms
12 [3356] cust-int.level3.net (64.152.81.62) 52 ms
13 [10310] vl17.bas2.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.64.150) 53 ms
14 [10310] w9.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.71.88) [target] 54 ms
LFT's trace took 5.23 seconds. Resolution required 3.58 seconds.
Note the -Ar above displays ASNs using the RADB as a whois source. A
better option may have been to use the -A alone or perhaps -AC.
And why not request netblock lookups?
[edge.lax]$ lft -S -N www.microsoft.com
Hop LFT trace to www.us.microsoft.com (207.46.197.113):80/tcp
1 [LOS-NETTOS-BLK4] ln-gateway.centergate.com (206.117.161.1) 2 ms
2 [LOS-NETTOS] isi-acg.ln.net (130.152.136.1) 3 ms
3 [LOS-NETTOS] isi-1-lngw2-pos.ln.net (130.152.80.30) 5 ms
4 [GNTY-4-0] gigether5-0.lsanca1-cr3.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.249) 4 ms
5 [GNTY-4-0] p6-0.lsanca1-cr6.bbnplanet.net (4.24.4.2) 3 ms
6 [GNTY-4-0] p6-0.lsanca2-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.5.49) 3 ms
7 [GNTY-4-0] p15-0.snjpca1-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.5.58) 10 ms
8 [GNTY-4-0] p9-0.snjpca1-br2.bbnplanet.net (4.24.9.130) 11 ms
9 [GNTY-4-0] so-1-0-0.sttlwa2-br1.bbnplanet.net (4.0.3.229) 27 ms
10 [GNTY-4-0] so-0-0-0.sttlwa1-hcr1.bbnplanet.net (4.24.11.202) 28 ms
11 [GNTY-4-0] so-7-0-0.sttlwa1-hcr2.bbnplanet.net (4.24.10.234) 28 ms
12 [GNTY-4-0] p1-0.sttlwa1-cr2.bbnplanet.net (4.24.10.241) 29 ms
13 [GNTY-4-0] p2-0.msseattle.bbnplanet.net (4.25.89.6) 32 ms
14 [MICROSOFT-GLOBAL-NET] 207.46.154.9 32 ms
15 [MICROSOFT-GLOBAL-NET] 207.46.155.17 33 ms
16 [MICROSOFT-GLOBAL-NET] 207.46.129.51 [prohibited] 35 ms
TROUBLESHOOTING
If traces don't appear to go anywhere, there are a number of things to
try. If you are receiving an error related to permissions, be sure the
lft executable is set-uid root so it may execute with root-level permis-
sions required to utilize raw sockets on most operating systems.
If you do not receive permissions-related errors, but traces still don't
go anywhere, first activate verbose output by adding -VV to your command
line options. Then, reading the verbose output, if you see trace probes
going out, but no replies being detected (as indicated by "RCVD" tags),
you may: Use the TCP basic (-b) method if you wish to use TCP probes and
you fear NAT may be causing your trace to fail. Alternatively, select a
different trace method and protocol such as UDP (-u) or ICMP (-p).
If you are attempting to use RFC 1393 (-P) and your trace is failing,
this is likely because network equipment somewhere in the path does not
conform to RFC 1393. Your only option is to select an alternative trac-
ing method or protocol.
If you are attempting to utilize adaptive mode (-E/-e) and traces fail,
first try enabling NAT compatibility using TCP basic (-b). If traces
still fail, the most likely reason is a close-proximity stateful firewall
in your network, which prevents this feature from working.
AUTHORS
Victor Oppleman, Eugene Antsilevitch, Sergey Kondryukov and other helpers
around the world.
REPORTING BUGS
To report bugs, send e-mail to <lft@oppleman.com>
SEE ALSO
traceroute(8), netstat(1), whois(1), whob(8)
HISTORY
The lft command first appeared in 1998 as 'fft'. Renamed as a result of
confusion with fast fourier transforms, lft stands for 'layer four
traceroute.' Thanks also to Nils McCarthy for writing 'FFT', LFT's pre-
decessor.
LFT August 17, 2002 LFT
lft 3.36 - Generated Fri May 9 18:26:17 CDT 2014