[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
6.3.6 The Future of aclocal
aclocal
is expected to disappear. This feature really
should not be offered by Automake. Automake should focus on
generating ‘Makefile’s; dealing with M4 macros really is
Autoconf's job. That some people install Automake just to use
aclocal
, but do not use automake
otherwise is an
indication of how that feature is misplaced.
The new implementation will probably be done slightly differently. For instance, it could enforce the ‘m4/’-style layout discussed in Handling Local Macros.
We have no idea when and how this will happen. This has been discussed several times in the past, but someone still has to commit itself to that non-trivial task.
From the user point of view, aclocal
's removal might turn
out to be painful. There is a simple precaution that you may take to
make that switch more seamless: never call aclocal
yourself.
Keep this guy under the exclusive control of autoreconf
and
Automake's rebuild rules. Hopefully you won't need to worry about
things breaking, when aclocal
disappears, because everything
will have been taken care of. If otherwise you used to call
aclocal
directly yourself or from some script, you will
quickly notice the change.
Many packages come with a script called ‘bootstrap.sh’ or
‘autogen.sh’, that will just call aclocal
,
libtoolize
, gettextize
or autopoint
,
autoconf
, autoheader
, and automake
in
the right order. Actually this is precisely what autoreconf
can do for you. If your package has such a ‘bootstrap.sh’ or
‘autogen.sh’ script, consider using autoreconf
. That
should simplify its logic a lot (less things to maintain, yum!), it's
even likely you will not need the script anymore, and more to the point
you will not call aclocal
directly anymore.
For the time being, third-party packages should continue to install
public macros into ‘/usr/share/aclocal/’. If aclocal
is replaced by another tool it might make sense to rename the
directory, but supporting ‘/usr/share/aclocal/’ for backward
compatibility should be really easy provided all macros are properly
written (see section Writing your own aclocal macros).
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |